Cenotaphe Bleu

Cenotaphe Bleu is a research-based artwork that integrates motion-image creation with socio-political analysis through the depiction of a fictional monument, using the obelisk form as a symbol of Western colonial authority imposed upon colonized lands. The obelisk’s visual and cultural distance from local everyday life is intentionally constructed to emphasize the disconnection between the lived realities of the public and the utopian promises projected by the state promises that ultimately manifest as fictional narratives imposed upon society. The work critiques the state’s perspective, which mirrors the colonial gaze: projecting ideals onto its citizens without engaging their actual experiences. The visual presentation is developed through cinematographic techniques that use continuous camera movement to construct a spatial illusion, reflecting urban decay and social deterioration in relation to neglected monumental architecture. The chosen medium is 3D digital animation perceived as fabricated realism, and intaglio printmaking evoking the texture of archival documentation are deliberately juxtaposed to convey conflicting perceptions of truth, mirroring the contradictions in Bandung’s urban infrastructure and the unfulfilled narratives of state-led development.

Keywords: Monument, Cinematography, Dystopia, Obelisk, Fictional Architecture, Cenotaph

[1] H. K. Bhabha, The Location of Culture. Routledge, 2004.

[2] A. Kusno, Behind the Postcolonial: Architecture, Urban Space, and Political Cultures in Indonesia. Routledge, 2000.

[3] J. Pallasmaa, “The Existential Image: Lived Space in Cinema and Architecture,” Phainomenon, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 157–174, 2012, doi: 10.2478/phainomenon-2012-0020.

[4] M. Kiessel and J. Stubbs, “Urban Dystopia on Screen: The City, Architecture and Power in the Contemporary Science Fiction Film,” Athens Journal of Architecture, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 417–450, 2023, doi: 10.30958/aja.9-4-4.

[5] R. Tobe, Film, Architecture and Spatial imagination. Routledge, 2016.

[6] S. Shapshay, “What is the Monumental?” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 145–160, 2021, doi: 10.1093/jaac/kpab002.

[7] J. Winter, Sites of Memory, Sites of Mourning: The Great War in European cultural history. Cambridge University Press, 1995.

[8] “What is a cenotaph memorial?” Cemetery.com. Accessed: May 11, 2025. [Online]. Available : https://www.cemetery.com/learning-center/memorials-headstones/what-is-a-cenotaph-memorial J. Winter, Sites of Memory, Sites of Mourning: The Great War in European cultural history. Cambridge University Press, 1995.

[9] H. W. Setiawan and S. Sabana, “Priangan dalam Kehidupan Franz Wilhelm Junghuhn,” SUSURGALUR, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 31–56, 2015, doi: 10.2121/susurgalur.v3i1.93.

[10] K. Sağlam and S. Durmuş Öztürk, “Redefining the Concept of Timeless in Architecture: Cenotaph for Newton,” in International Architectural Design Conference/ARCHDESIGN ‘20 Proceedings, pp. 133–146, 2021.

[11] J. Brockelman, Obelisks and the Power of Monument, [History & Classics Undergraduate Thesis]. United States: Providence College; 2023, [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/history_undergrad_theses/64

[12] B. Gustaman and H. F. Khoeruman, “Antara Mitos dan Realitas: Historisitas Maung di Tatar Sunda,” Metahumaniora, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 2019, doi: 10.24198/metahumaniora.v9i1.22873.